This FAQ contains information culled from the (defunct) Lambic mailing list archives, the Lambic Digest archives, and discussions with some of the more frequent contributors. Please keep in mind that this style, more then any other, is more Art than Science. That means that no matter how authoritative anyone sounds, they only _really_ know what has worked for them so far. Several PhD theses have been written on aspects of this process, and more are certainly to come. Even commercial Lambic brewers only really know that it works, not _how_ it works. We, as homebrewers, can only try to achieve an approximation of a Lambic. In summary: This FAQ, and the Lambic Digest in general is just a discussion of ideas that have (or have not) worked for others. It is merely a starting point, and guide, for your own experiments. This is no `One True Way', or gospel of Lambic production. Good Luck to you! and if you succeed, please let us know how you did it. Oh - and please don't take `Judges Comments' about your beer too seriously, unless you _know_ the judges know what they're talking about. This is such a different style that most judges don't know what they are tasting.What good books exist on these beers?
For tasting:
- For Brewing: 'Lambic' by Jean-Xavier Guinard, Brewers Publications. This is a very good book on brewing lambic beers, though expect longer maturation times then he presents.
- 'Belgian Ale' by Pierre Rajotte, Brewers Publications. This book is a bit sketchy, but still a good buy. Reactions vary, but general consensus seems to be mild disappointment. Coverage of strong ale and specials is better than things like Wit's and 'oud Bruin's.
- `Just Brew It: Beer and Brewing V.12, 1992 AHA conference notes' edited by Tracy Loysen, Brewers Publications. This book has a good article on Lambics & Browns by Michael Matucheski, and an even better one on Lambics by Mike Sharp and Martin Lodahl.
- Lambic Digest & Lambic Mailing List archives. While I tried to distill these into this FAQ, they remain a good source of information. Do go through them all though, as opinions change over time.
- Michael Jackson (surprise!)
- World Guide to Beer.
- Pocket Guide to Beer.
- Great Beers of Belgium.
First thing, remember that Belgium has two major languages spoken within its borders. This means that the are often two pronunciations, if not two spellings for a lot of words. Lambic is pronounced 'lom-BEEK'. Gueuze can be pronounced variously as 'goozuh', 'geuzuh', 'gooz', 'geuz', 'gerz', or 'gerzuh'. Most people seem to have settled on `gooz' or `geuz'. Kriek is 'kreek'. Framboise (Frambozenbier) is 'fram-bwahz' ('fram-bozen-beer'). How are all these funny words pronounced?
Several things. Generally, the first thing that a taster notices is that the beer is sour. In the case of a good, traditional Lambic, like those made by Cantillon or Frank Boon, the beer can be extremely sour. Lambics usually have a very complex aroma and flavor that is caused by the assortment of wild yeasts and bacteria present. Lambics also have no hop character at all, only aged hops are used. Beyond that, the best thing is to taste a few. What makes a Lambic so different?
Sometimes a homebrew supply will have some old hops sitting around. Health food stores are known for having sometimes very old hops. You can age them yourself (2.5-3 years is good). A few brewers have had good success with artificially aging the hops by baking them at 200-300 degrees (F) for 1/2 to 1 hour, then leaving them in the open for a few days. Where do I find aged hops?
There are several methods that have been used to achieve sourness in beer. How can I get sour beer?
- Sour Mash.
This is the method described by Charley Papazian in his book. Basically, it relies on bacteria sometimes found on grain to sour the beer before mashing.
Pro: When this works, it allows the brewer very good control over the degreeof sourness.
Con: This method is problematic. Several brewers have tried this with disastrous or disappointing results. Also, for Lambic's, the sourness achieved will lack the complexity of the real thing.
- Add lactic acid. This method has been used by many people fairly successfully.
Pro: Allows good control over sourness.
Con: Most sour beers have more to them then their sourness. Adding acid only gives a one dimensional flavor. This might be a good method for a Berliner Weiss though.
- Culture relevant bacteria/wild yeasts. This is the preferred method.
Pro: Can achieve the most complexity possible.
Con: Difficult to culture, takes a long time to mature.
If proper care is taken to clean and sterilize equipment, then this has not proven a problem. Recommendations: Once the special cultures are in the lambic, it should only be held in glass. If cooperage is used, it should be in a separate area. More problems might be expected in a larger brewery then a home brewery, as there are more places for the bugs to hide. Won't fermenting Lambics infect my other beers?
Since a true Lambic can only be produced in Payottenland, by spontaneous fermentation, what should I call my humble attempts? Technically, we should not use the word 'Lambic' at all, but because not doing so is to difficult, many use 'pseudo-Lambic', `pureculture Lambic' or pLambic for short. The phrase 'Lambic-style' is also used. I want to show respect for Belgian Lambic brewers and their products.
For Lambic, you should have at least Pediococcus damnosus(sometimes given as P. cerevisiae) and one of either Brettanomyces lambicus or Brettanomyces bruxellensis (using both adds more complexity). Some cultures of B. bruxellensis seem to have more `horsey' character. There are others, mentioned in 'Lambic',that can also be used. For Berliner Weiss (not Belgian, not a lambic, but because it is sour, it is associated) uses just 'Lactobacillus delbruckii'. For a Flander's Brown or Belgian Red, unknown. How about some more research here? What cultures do I need?
Cultures for pLambics can be had from a couple of different sources. Remember that there is as much variation in `Brettanomyces Lambicus' (or Brux., or Pedio...) as there is in `Saccharomyces Cerevisiae' (unless you think Whitbread is the same as, say, that used in Bavarian wheat beer) - only almost no work has been done in isolating and identifying these strain variations. Try cultures from different sources, experiment! Where can I get the beasts?
Yeastlabs (Dist. by G.W. Kent) produces a Pediococcus damnosus culture and a Brettanomyces lambicus culture. These cultures were isolated from Cantillon Gueuze by Mike Sharp and Shari Almeda, and have been through both lab and brewing tests. G.W. Kent is a distributer, ask your local home brew supply or favorite mail-order supplier to get these for you.
Wyeast is selling a Brettanomyces (bruxellensis?) culture.
Brewers Resource sells a Brettanomyces lambicus culture now, and will be adding a Pediococcus culture soon (if not already).
You might also check with the Yeast Culture Kit company.
There are also University & National level yeast collections, but these are usually difficult to get cultures from as a homebrewer, and very expensive.
For basic information on yeast culturing, see the yeast issue of Zymurgy, the Yeast FAQ in rec.crafts.brewing, or any of the other good articles on culturing that have been published. In general, develop skill at culturing regular yeasts before even attempting these. For culturing Pedio., it has been found that it does better in a liquid culture then on agar. Also, use MRS broth (from Diffco) or add a little (about 10%) tomato or apple juice to the wort. The media should me autoclaved (pressure cooked) at 15psi for 20min. Simply boiling will not work, as it doesn't kill off things like mold spores. Also, a Pedio. culture should _not_ be aerated, as it is an anaerobic bacteria. For both Pedio. and Brett., the medium should have a little (.5%) Calcium Carbonate as a buffer. Cheap agar can be had from a health food store or Chinese market. Both Pedio. and Brett. take quite a bit longer to grow then common beer yeasts, so give them time. They also will look differently. They will not get bubbly, or develop a kraeusen on top. Pedio. will sometimes develop a wrinkly pellicle on top that has been described as 'stringy' or like a 'brain cross section'. Brett. will sometimes develop a waxy looking pellicle, sometimes with large bubbles in it. These pellicles are normal, but not always present. Don't expect a pellicle sooner then a few months, even if one is going to develop. When making starters, allow at least a week for the starter to get going. Possibly two or three for Pedio. Remember, _do_not_ aerate the Pedio. starter! How do I culture these bacteria/wild yeasts?
Again, the book `Lambic' by J-X Guinard is recommended reading before making a Lambic, though a brewer should use more aged hops, and expect longer maturation times then he gives. How do I make a Lambic?
GRIST
HOPS
- 60% Pale, 2-row malted barley.
- 40% UNmalted, soft white wheat. (Can often be found at a health food store)
DECOCTION MASH
- Should include 'a lot' of hops in the kettle. (Guinard says 2.5lbs per 100lbs grain, which is 4 oz for 5 gal.) Hops should be aged about three years! They should have _no_ bitterness or aroma. Typical varieties include Brewer's Gold, Northern Brewer, Fuggles, Styrian, Hallertauer, etc.
INFUSION MASH
- mash in at 113-120f and rest for 10min.step to 136 for 15 min.
- step to 149 for 15 min.
- step to 162 for 20 min.
- step to 170 for 20 min.
- mash out at 170f
- Start sparging at 173f and increase to 190-200f by the end of the sparge. Yes, you want the tannins.
Boil for 2-3.5 hours. Hops go in at the beginning. After wort has cooled, transfer it to (preferably) a oak cast that has either been used for wine for a couple of years, or has been treated to remove tannins. A regular fermenter is OK, but should be glass once before anything other then a normal beer yeast is added. Start primary fermentation with a regular, highly attenuating ale yeast, preferably without much flavor. Chico works well. Inoculate with Pedio. & Brett. cultures. Wait. Wait. Wait. After a few months you have a young Lambic. This can be aged further, mixed with fruit, bottled, etc.
- mash in at 95f and hold for 15 min.
- increase to 113 for 15 min.
- increase to 131 for 15 min.
- increase to 149 for 15 min.
- mash off at 162 to 164
- boil it, grain & all. Just get it started.
- Sparge at 200f
Not everyone follows those exact steps of course. Remember, this is an Art, not a science.
MARTIN LODAHL - BATCH#1, ALL GRAIN Here are a few recipes:
NOTES:
- 7# 2-row pale
- 3.5# flaked wheat
- .5# crystal
- 1/3 oz Chinook*
- 1/3 oz Willamette*
- 1/3 oz Northern Brewer*
- * - Special Process - See Below.
- Wyeast 1007 (German Ale) Yeast
- Pediococcus Damnosus culture
- Brettanomyces Bruxellensis culture
- 1 tsp yeast nutrient
- 3/4 cup dextrose for priming.
- process:2 hours, hops added near start.
- Fermented in glass.
MIKE SHARP - BATCH#2, ALL GRAIN
- 4/30/91 started
- 5/10/91 Added Pedio.
The primary yeast strain (Wyeast 1007) produced sulfury notes. Should probably not use again.- 5/20/91 Added Brett.
Batch is ropey (Pedio. pellicle), starting to get a sour flavor.- 10/25/91 Ropey again.
(No Recipe given for batch #1 - Many comments on oakiness though, due to the use of a new oak cask)PROCESS:
- 2#, 6oz Malted wheat
- 6#, 10oz Pale Malt
- 5oz Crystal (40 lovibond)
- 2 oz Perle, aged several years.
- Step infusion mash, all grains mashed with 3 gal @ 130<
- 130 for 15min,
- 140 for 15 min,
- 158 for 45 min,
- 170 for 10 min,
- run off wort, recycle 1st gal. through bed
- sparge with 3 gal @ 170
- sparge with 2 gal @ 180
- Yield: 7 gal.
- Boil for 2 hours, hops added at start.
- Pitched Wyeast 1338.
NOTES:
- 5/10/91 Started.
- 5/24/91 Added Pedio.
- ? Added Brett.
- 9/11/91 Going well.
MIKE SHARP - BATCH #3, EXTRACT
NOTES:
- 6 Cans (3.3lb ea) M&F Wheat Extract (55% wheat, 45% malt)
- 3oz aged Perle hops
- 15+ gal water
- Chimay Red yeast culture
- Boil for 1 hour, hops in at start.
- 7/15/91 Started
- ? Added Brett / Pedio
- 9/11/91 Going well, very acid.
- 9/26/91 Pellicle changing from 'ropy scum' to thin and whitish as the Brett takes over.
- 12/16/91 Mixing with 15 lbs frozen raspberries.
AL KORZONAS - BATCH #1, EZTRACT
After 3 months in a white, 20 gallon HDPE Brute, the batch was split into four sub-batches:
- For 15 gallons of base pLambiek
- 6.6# Northwestern Weizen Malt Extract
- 6.6# Northwestern Gold Malt Extract
- 3.3# Northwestern Amber Malt Extract
- 1.5# Dextrose
- 3.0oz Hallertauer Leaf Hops (1.5 years old + baked 20 min at 250F)
- 15gal Palos Hills Tapwater (quite soft)
- 8gm Gypsum
- 6gm Sodium Chloride
- 24 floz starter from Sierra Nevada Pale Ale (same as Wyeast #1056)
- 16 floz starter of Brettanomyces lambicus (two weeks in starter flask)
- 16 floz starter of Pediococcus cerevisiae (two weeks in starter flask)
- Boil: 2hrs
- OG: oops!
- SG after 20 days: 1019
- SG after 3 months: 1012
Sub-batch A was bottled after six months on fruit, the other three are still in the secondaries (now 17 months since starting the batch). Sub-batch A was entered in the 1993 AHA Nationals and made it to the second round. Judge's comments primarily pointed out that the Brettanomyces character horsey, sweaty) were not strong enough. I plan to combat this problem by pitching both Brettanomyces lambicus and Brettanomyces bruxellensis along with the Pediococcus cerevisiae in my next batch. I am considering delaying the pitching of the Saccharomyces until the Brett and Pedio have had a head start, but this may be an invitation for molds, acetobacter and unwanted (phenolic) wild yeasts, so I'm still unsure if I will delay or not.
- sub-batch A: 15 lbs dark, sweet cherries + 4.25 gallons of p-lambic,
- sub-batch B: 13.5 lbs dark, sweet, pitted cherries + 4.25 gallons p-lambic,
- sub-batch C: 12 lbs red raspberries + 1 gallon boiled/chilled water (result of the fruit sanitation) + 3.25 gallons of p-lambic
- sub-batch D: 3.25 gallons of p-lambic (destined to be pseudo-gueuze).
Well - they work. Follow all the usual kit rules. I.E. Don't use sugar, throw away the yeast and use a better brand. With the Kriek kit you must be careful _not_ to boil the extract, as that will destroy what little flavor is there. You still need to pitch Pedio & Brett if you want `real' lambic flavors. In fact, if you are going to wait that long, an do all that culture work, why use a kit? Go for it! Better success can be achieved by using bulk extract as in recipe #3 above. What about the Brewferm Kits?
No, in fact, not using one makes area sanitation easier. However, results seem to indicate that using a cask produces more complexity and more 'real' lambic flavors. There is some evidence to indicate that Brettanomyces has some affinity with wood, and produces more flavor when in contact with it. If you use glass fermenters, add some French oak chips - they will help. I hope this answers more questions then it creates... Is a cask required.
Larry Lynch-Freshner
Biohazard Home Page